Pope Francis imbued the ancient word parrhesia with new significance, framing “frank, bold, courageous speech” as a partner concept to his signature vision of a “listening church.” After tracing Michel Foucault’s genealogy of the term, I argue that Francis’s pneumatological turn is a creative ressourcement of parrhesia, one that would require major shifts for the present church to embrace. To illuminate the challenging intra-ecclesial dynamics of parrhesia, I analyze three case studies of figures from Vatican II whose frank, bold, courageous speech met institutional backlash. I conclude with implications for realizing a more parrhesiastic culture in a synodal church.

This essay dwells on a crucially important dimension of the church’s synodal renewal: personal renewal. First, I suggest that, to bring out the notion’s full weight, it is helpful to link it to the Second Vatican Council’s teaching on the universal call to holiness and its transformation during the council. Second, I suggest that synodality enriches the council’s teaching by being more specific about what holiness entails and that it may provide the reception of the council’s teaching on holiness with a fresh impetus. In the conclusion, I suggest that thematizing personal renewal balances conceptual and spiritual approaches to ecclesiology.

For more than a century, canon law has been overwhelmingly understood as the purview of canonists, quite apart from the work of theologians. Insufficient understanding of and appreciation for the history and function of canon law on the part of theologians are both a product of this perceived separation and a factor contributing to its perpetuation. This article argues that the realization of the theological vision of Vatican II, and the success of the Synod on Synodality, will require greater understanding of the form and function of canon law in the Roman Catholic Church.

Contemporary society’s political dynamics, especially the progressive-conservative divide, shape perceptions of the church and color perspectives on its future. Can ecclesiology provide a compelling alternative to political readings of the church, an alternative that is authentically theological, attentive to context, and conducive to realistic hope for the church’s future? To respond to that question, this article develops an “integral ecclesiology” that encompasses the implications that the church’s relationship to God has for its mission, engagement with history, ongoing conversion, and orientation to an eschatological fulfillment. The article concludes by briefly considering the Final Document of the Synod on Synodality (2021−24) as an expression of integral ecclesiology.

This article proposes an ecumenical understanding of Christian tradition that valorizes the pluralism of Christian confessions as virtuous efforts to receive the gift of divine revelation. Its argument culminates in an eschatological ecclesiology that might serve as an aesthetic for appreciating the role of tradition in ecumenical dialogue.

Bernard Lonergan develops a rich theology of prayer in his article “The Mediation of Christ in Prayer.” When his theology of prayer is integrated with his soteriology, theology of history, and argument for theology as a praxis, it reveals the role of prayer in historical recovery and yields a revitalized theology of the cross. More particularly, Lonergan recommends prayerfully encountering Christ’s redemptive deeds in Ignatius of Loyola’s Spiritual Exercises. This encounter cultivates the real apprehension of the mystery of redemption that is both the principle of historical recovery and the heart of a revitalized theology of the cross that neither trivializes evil nor sacralizes violence.